All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

The Lupus Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lupus Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a grant from AstraZeneca. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2023-12-22T10:30:24.000Z

Post-hoc analyses of phase II PAISLEY trial in patients with SLE treated with deucravacitinib

Dec 22, 2023
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in systemic lupus erythematosus.

The Lupus Hub previously reported results from the phase II PAISLEY trial (NCT03252587), demonstrating the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib vs placebo in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we summarize several post-hoc analyses of the PAISLEY trial presented at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) annual meeting (ACR Convergence 2023).

Key findings

  • Furie et al.1 and Morand et al.2 demonstrated a shorter median time to response and higher response rate at Week 48 with deucravacitinib treatment (Figure 1A; Figure 1B).
  • Arriens et al.3 showed that deucravacitinib resulted in a higher proportion of patients achieving Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-70 at Week 48 (Figure 1B).

Figure 1. A Median time to onset of SRI(4), BICLA, dual SRI(4)/BICLA, and LLDAS response and B response rate with SRI(4), BICLA, dual SRI(4)/BICLA, and CLASI-70* 

BICLA, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–based Composite Lupus Assessment; CLASI, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index; LLDAS, Lupus Low Disease Activity State; NE, not estimable; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SRI(4), SLE Responder Index-4.
*Data from Furie, et al.1; Morand, et al.2; and Arriens, et al.3
Because they exceeded the period of the study (48 weeks/336 days).
Due to a less than 50% probability of achieving LLDAS at any time point.

Transcriptomic analysis by Wu et al.4 revealed that:

  • Patients with SLE expressed higher levels of interferon (IFN)-regulated genes, including IFIT1 (interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1) and interferon induced protein 44, which were significantly reduced following treatment with deucravacitinib.
  • CMPK2 (cytidine/uridine monophosphate kinase 2) and interferon induced protein 44 appear to be particularly relevant to SLE pathophysiology.

Further, a novel IFN 5 gene (MX1 [MX Dynamin Like GTPase 1], HERC5 [HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 5], IFIT1 [interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1], RSAD2 [radical S-adenosyl methionine domain containing 2], and EIF2AK2 [eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 2]) signature was developed by Wu et al.5 to classify patients with SLE into IFN high or IFN low subgroups. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed that deucravacitinib:

  • Reduced IFN 5 gene score and anti-double stranded DNA antibody titers in both groups.
  • At Week 32, higher SRI(4) was observed with a dosage of 3 mg twice daily and 12 mg once daily, along with an increased British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–based Composite Lupus Assessment response rate at Week 48.

Mosca et al.6 assessed patient-reported outcomes and revealed that deucravacitinib achieved clinically meaningful improvements (meeting or exceeding minimal clinically important/minimally important differences) in pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life from baseline at Week 48 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Patient-reported outcome measures in post-hoc analysis of the phase II PAISLEY trial* 

MCID, minimal clinically important difference; MID, minimally important difference; NRS, numeric rating scale; PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.
*Adapted from Mosca, et al.6

Key learnings

  • The post-hoc analyses support the robust efficacy of deucravacitinib across multiple SLE response indices, including disease activity, cutaneous manifestations, and improvements in patient-reported outcomes.
  • The novel pharmacodynamic biomarker, IFN 5 gene score, categorizes patients into IFN high and low subgroups. While the clinical response improvement may vary, this score affirms the mechanism of action of deucravacitinib and may aid in phase III dose selection.
  • Two phase III trials (NCT05617677; NCT05620407) investigating deucravacitinib in patients with SLE are currently ongoing.

  1. Furie R, Arriens C, Kalunian K, et al. Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in a phase 2 trial in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): Achievement of sustained SRI(4), BICLA and dual responses over 48 weeks. Abstract #596. American College of Rheumatology annual meeting (ACR Convergence 2023); Nov 10–15, 2023; San Diego, US.
  2. Morand E, Hobar C, Pomponi S, et al. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) achievement with deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in a phase 2 trial in SLE. Abstract #1501. American College of Rheumatology annual meeting (ACR Convergence 2023); Nov 10-15, 2023; San Diego, US.
  3. Arriens C, van Vollenhoven R, Gottlieb A, et al. Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) achievement and sustained response with deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in a phase 2 trial in SLE. Abstract #2489. American College of Rheumatology annual meeting (ACR Convergence 2023); Nov 10-15, 2023; San Diego, US.
  4. Wu C, Arriens C, Kahlenberg J, et al. Pharmacodynamic changes in SLE relevant gene expression induced by deucravacitinib in patients enrolled in the phase 2 PAISLEY trial. Abstract #1507. American College of Rheumatology annual meeting (ACR Convergence 2023); Nov 10-15, 2023; San Diego, US.
  5. Wu C, Hu Y, Crow M, et al. Development of an IFN 5-Gene Signature Score to identify IFN-high and IFN-low subsets and as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for deucravacitinib treatment in a phase 2 trial in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Abstract #847. American College of Rheumatology annual meeting (ACR Convergence 2023); Nov 10-15, 2023; San Diego, US.
  6. Mosca M, Arnaud L, Askanase A, et al. Deucravacitinib, an oral, allosteric, tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: Patient-reported outcomes in a phase 2 trial. Abstract #2328. American College of Rheumatology annual meeting (ACR Convergence 2023); Nov 10-15, 2023; San Diego, US.

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lupus delivered to your inbox