All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lupus Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a grant from AstraZeneca. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
The Lupus Hub previously reported results from the phase II PAISLEY trial (NCT03252587), demonstrating the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib vs placebo in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we summarize several post-hoc analyses of the PAISLEY trial presented at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) annual meeting (ACR Convergence 2023).
Figure 1. A Median time to onset of SRI(4), BICLA, dual SRI(4)/BICLA, and LLDAS response and B response rate with SRI(4), BICLA, dual SRI(4)/BICLA, and CLASI-70*
BICLA, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–based Composite Lupus Assessment; CLASI, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index; LLDAS, Lupus Low Disease Activity State; NE, not estimable; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SRI(4), SLE Responder Index-4.
*Data from Furie, et al.1; Morand, et al.2; and Arriens, et al.3
†Because they exceeded the period of the study (48 weeks/336 days).
‡Due to a less than 50% probability of achieving LLDAS at any time point.
Transcriptomic analysis by Wu et al.4 revealed that:
Further, a novel IFN 5 gene (MX1 [MX Dynamin Like GTPase 1], HERC5 [HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 5], IFIT1 [interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1], RSAD2 [radical S-adenosyl methionine domain containing 2], and EIF2AK2 [eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 2]) signature was developed by Wu et al.5 to classify patients with SLE into IFN high or IFN low subgroups. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed that deucravacitinib:
Mosca et al.6 assessed patient-reported outcomes and revealed that deucravacitinib achieved clinically meaningful improvements (meeting or exceeding minimal clinically important/minimally important differences) in pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life from baseline at Week 48 (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Patient-reported outcome measures in post-hoc analysis of the phase II PAISLEY trial*
MCID, minimal clinically important difference; MID, minimally important difference; NRS, numeric rating scale; PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.
*Adapted from Mosca, et al.6
Key learnings |
|
Subscribe to get the best content related to lupus delivered to your inbox